For machine builders · EU Cyber Resilience Act

The CRA readiness platform for machine builders.

Resilic makes your machines in the field ready to report: products, SBOMs, vulnerability correlation and the Article 14 report in one workflow. The duty has applied since 11 September 2026, including to machines already shipped. AI drafts; you sign.

No credit card · 30-day trial · Set up in an afternoon

In force since 11 Sep 2026
Article 14 reporting — for products already in the field.
94
days
6
hrs
53
min
Article 14 in force since 11 Sep 2026CycloneDX & SPDX SBOMsEUVD · NVD · CISA KEV · EPSSWCAG AA · DE & EN

What you get

Know in minutes

Fleet loaded by CSV, SBOMs imported, first matches the same day: you see which shipped machine is hit by an actively-exploited CVE, correlated across EUVD, NVD and CISA KEV.

Draft in one click

When a report is due, the Article 14 draft is ready for all three stages, cited to its sources and mapped to the ENISA platform’s fields. You review and sign; nothing is auto-submitted.

Never miss a deadline

Every reportable event carries its clock: 24 hours to the early warning, 72 to the notification, with reminders to your team, so no deadline catches you out.

Four deadlines. One body of evidence.

The Cyber Resilience Act doesn't arrive all at once. It lands in waves, and each wave reuses the work from the last. Start with Article 14 and cover the remaining obligations on the same platform, step by step; you never start over.

11 Sep 2026 · In force
Article 14 reporting
Actively-exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents, reported on a 24h / 72h / 14-day cascade via ENISA's platform, for products already in the field.
Applies now — what Resilic covers today
20 Jan 2027
Machinery Regulation
2023/1230 makes cybersecurity an essential health & safety requirement. Your CRA evidence starts doing double duty.
Dual-compliance expansion
11 Dec 2027
Full CRA application
SBOM, secure-by-design, vulnerability handling, technical documentation, CE marking and conformity assessment.
The platform for full application
2 Aug 2028
AI Act for machinery
ML-based safety components become high-risk AI. CRA Art. 12 makes your cybersecurity evidence reusable for AI-Act Art. 15.
Same body of evidence

Three steps to your first Article 14 report.

Most teams are ready within an afternoon. You bring your products and SBOMs; Resilic does the correlation and the first draft.

STEP 01

Catalogue your fleet

Add every product, version and customer deployment, by hand or by CSV import. The bill of materials per version comes from your CycloneDX or SPDX SBOM, from assembling it from components, or from Resilic Edge in the control cabinet; AI matches components to known identifiers for you to confirm.

STEP 02

See what actually hits you

Resilic correlates your components against EUVD, NVD and the CISA KEV catalogue: actively-exploited first, with EPSS context. AI triage explains whether a CVE really affects your product, with sources cited.

STEP 03

Draft, review, sign, done

When a report is required, a guided editor maps to the ENISA Single Reporting Platform fields with the AI-drafted content pre-filled. A live deadline panel tracks the cascade. You review, edit and sign; nothing leaves without you.

Everything CRA readiness needs, in one workflow.

Not a generic AppSec scanner and not a slide-deck GRC tool. A workflow built around how machine builders actually work.

Vulnerability correlation: the heart

The one view that answers "is any fielded machine at risk right now?" Your fleet, matched against EUVD, NVD and CISA KEV, prioritised by active exploitation and EPSS. Each row carries the affected products and the suggested next action, and a one-click Start Article 14 report when it's exploited.

Prioritised vulnerabilities
ExploitedCVE-2025-48813 products
EPSS 41%CVE-2025-12901 product
TriagedCVE-2024-9033Not affected

Your machines in the field, at a glance

You know which machine runs which version at which customer today, with SBOM, vulnerability and support-period status beside it.

Every component, identified and watched

Import CycloneDX and SPDX bills of materials; AI matches components to known identifiers, you confirm with confidence shown. When a new vulnerability appears, you know the same day whom it hits.

The Article 14 report, drafted for you

A staged form for early warning, notification and final report, mapped to the ENISA platform, with live countdowns. Export opens only after your sign-off: you file, never the software.

Supplier SBOMs without the chasing

Request SBOMs and commitments through a simple portal in your branding, and qualify suppliers with a structured questionnaire. You see who has delivered and who still owes.

Evidence an audit can find

What was reported and who signed it is recorded with timestamp and author and cannot be changed afterwards. An assessor finds the signature, not an email.

Policies & CRA docs, drafted

A CVD policy and CRA technical documentation from templates, AI-drafted and human-approved. You never start from a blank page, and the draft-or-approved state is always visible.

Advisories published as CSAF, on your domain

Approve a security advisory and Resilic publishes it as a signed CSAF 2.0 feed under your verified domain, with security.txt and a daily refresh. Your customers find your advisories where aggregators such as the EUVD expect them.

AI-use policy and staff attestation

Draft your AI-use policy or upload the one you have, let staff confirm it through a personal link, and export the AI Act Article 4 evidence pack — the duty that already applies to every organisation using AI.

Resilic Edge: discovery on the plant network

An on-premise scanner finds machines and firmware on the plant network, PROFINET included, and matches them to your register — so the fleet view reflects what is actually installed.

Not a scanner. Not a GRC suite. Not a consultancy.

Machine builders face a stack of overlapping regimes, and tools built for horizontal software teams don't fit. Resilic is built around the CRA and how machine builders actually work.

vs. an SBOM scanner

Scanners list CVEs. Resilic tells you which ones hit a machine you have shipped, prioritised by active exploitation, then drafts the Article 14 report.

vs. a GRC platform

Generic checklists weren't written for the CRA or for machinery. Resilic is a workflow for machine builders: machines in the field, SBOMs, suppliers, vulnerabilities and reports in one place.

vs. a consultancy

A retainer produces slides. Resilic is software you own that keeps working between audits: your evidence reusable across CRA, Machinery and the AI Act.

Do the security work once. Prove it three times.

A connected machine is a "product with digital elements" under the CRA and machinery under the Machinery Regulation, and may soon embed high-risk AI. The obligations overlap. Resilic keeps one body of evidence and shows which regime each row satisfies.

Evidence you produce once
CRA
Machinery Reg.
AI Act (Art. 15)
SBOM & component inventory
Covered
Covered
Reusable
Vulnerability handling process
Covered
Covered
Reusable
Secure-by-design technical docs
Covered
EHSR 1.1.9
Art. 15
Incident & report audit trail
Art. 14
Covered
Reusable

Machinery Regulation and AI-Act modules expand from the same account as those deadlines approach: no migration, no re-entry.

AI drafts. You sign.

In a regulated domain, a black box is a liability. Every AI output in Resilic is drafted, cited and clearly labelled; then it waits for a human. Nothing is auto-submitted, ever.

  • Cited, not conjured. Every triage verdict and drafted paragraph links to the source it drew from: CVE records, KEV entries, your own SBOM.
  • Clearly labelled. AI-drafted content wears an "AI-drafted" tag until a named human reviews and approves it.
  • A human signs. Submitting a regulatory artifact always takes an explicit, attributed confirmation. The record shows who and when.
AI-drafted · CVE-2025-4881

This vulnerability in OpenSSL 3.0.x is likely exploitable in your PalletBot-X2 firmware 4.2: the affected TLS renegotiation path is reachable from the machine's remote-maintenance interface. An Article 14 report is recommended.

CISA KEV · added 2025-06-14 · known ransomware use
Your SBOM · PalletBot-X2 4.2 · openssl@3.0.11
Awaiting review by a compliance owner

Precise where it counts.

What actually earns your trust in a regulated domain.

  • Grounded in the official sources. Correlation runs on EUVD, NVD and CISA KEV with EPSS context, and reports map to the ENISA Single Reporting Platform. No black box: every verdict and draft cites where it came from.
  • European by design. Your data lives in the EU (AWS Frankfurt). AI drafts are produced by a Claude model from Anthropic through its API; EU processing of the AI calls is prepared but not active today. And nothing is filed on your behalf: a named human always signs.
  • No overselling. We state exactly what each obligation requires and when — and what Resilic deliberately does not do. This is readiness and evidence, not a compliance guarantee.

Three practice cases you may recognise yourself in.

Transparent tiers. Start free.

Priced by the number of your products, with no hidden quotes. A product is a product line or platform; the custom products derived from it do not count. Start on a 30-day trial and upgrade when you're ready.

Starter
For one product line on its way to reporting readiness.
€249/ month
or €2,490 / year — save 2 months · 1–3 products
  • Product and SBOM register
  • Fleet-wide vulnerability monitoring (EUVD, NVD, KEV)
  • Article 14 report workflow with export for the SRP
  • SBOM requests to suppliers
  • Template-based drafts, no AI
Most popular
Professional
For a portfolio with service in the field, where AI does the routine work.
€799/ month
or €7,900 / year — save 2 months · up to 15 products
  • Everything in Starter, up to 15 products
  • AI triage and AI drafts, 1,000 credits per month
  • CSAF advisories, CVD policy, security.txt
  • Risk assessment, Annex I register, technical documentation
  • Evidence vault and customer portal
  • 10 supplier qualifications, training, AI Act register
Enterprise
For several brands, sites or tenants, and full dual-compliance.
Custom
unlimited products and supplier seats
  • Everything in Professional, with no product or supplier limit
  • Enterprise SSO with your own identity provider
  • Machinery Regulation dual-compliance
  • Approved AI tools register
  • 5,000 AI credits per month
  • Invoicing and assisted setup
Free · no account needed

Not sure the CRA even applies to you?

Answer five questions and get an honest read on your scope, your deadlines, and where to start. Most machine builders are in scope, but not for everything at once. We'll tell you exactly which.

Do your machines contain software or firmware?
Do you place them on the EU market?
Are any network-connected?
Do you supply components to other builders?

The honest FAQ.

We'd rather be precise than alarmist. Here's what Resilic does — and what it deliberately doesn't.

Does Resilic make me "fully CRA-compliant"?

No. Anyone who claims that is overselling. Our first building block is Article 14 readiness: detect exploited vulnerabilities in your fleet and stand up the reporting workflow. Full CRA conformity (Dec 2027) is a later expansion on the same platform.

Article 14 already applies. What if we are not ready yet?

Start now; the obligation covers products already in the field. The CRA has real teeth: penalties reach up to €15 million or 2.5% of global annual turnover, and market-surveillance authorities can restrict or withdraw a product. We won’t fear-sell that: the point of Resilic is to get you ready within days, with the evidence to show it.

Does it file reports to the authorities for me?

No. Resilic drafts and organises everything to match the ENISA Single Reporting Platform, but a human always reviews and submits. AI drafts; you sign.

What's the 24h / 72h / 14-day cascade?

For actively-exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents, Article 14 requires an early warning within 24h, a notification within 72h, and a final report: for a vulnerability no later than 14 days after a corrective or mitigating measure is available, for an incident within one month of the 72-hour notification. Resilic tracks each stage with a live countdown.

We sell into the EU but aren't based there. Does it apply?

Very likely yes: the CRA is explicitly extraterritorial. If you place products with digital elements on the EU market, you're in scope regardless of where you're headquartered.

Which vulnerability sources do you use?

EUVD, NVD and the CISA KEV catalogue, with EPSS for exploitation-probability context. Actively-exploited issues are always surfaced first.

Where does the AI run, and what happens to our data?

Your data lives in the EU (AWS Frankfurt). AI drafts are produced by a Claude model from Anthropic through its API; under the provider’s terms your content is not used to train the models. EU processing of the AI calls is prepared but not active today. Every draft is labelled AI-drafted, and nothing is submitted without your signature.

Is it usable in German?

Yes. Resilic is built for German and English from day one, with WCAG AA contrast and full keyboard navigation, designed with longer German strings in mind.

Turn regulatory dread into "we’ve got this."

Set up your fleet, see your first vulnerability result, and know your Article 14 position — the obligation applies today, to products already in the field.

Or run the free scope check first

Stay ahead of the CRA deadlines

Occasional updates on Cyber Resilience Act milestones, ENISA guidance and Article 14 practice for machine builders. No spam, unsubscribe any time.

We use your email only for CRA update notifications. Unsubscribe anytime.